Osint
ICC vs. Sovereignty: An OSINT Analysis of the Positions of the United States, Israel, and the African UnionThe ICC is legally constituted as a court, but politically it operates
as a quasi-sovereign institution: it claims the authority to determine the
limits of its own jurisdiction, assess the adequacy of national justice
systems, neutralize the immunities of senior officials, and retain certain
powers after a state withdraws from the Rome Statute. At the same time, it has
no demos of its own, no constitutional mandate from the citizens of the
countries affected, no police force, no full system of checks and balances, and
no uniform capacity to enforce its decisions.